I subimit that the presence of government presumes a state of war, either explicit or implicit. The implicit state of war presumed by government is naturally the least obvious and the least intuitive. Government, by its very foundational philosophical premises, cannot in any rationally consistent way limit its authority to force all which exists outside of it to be absolutely subordinate to the collective Ideal which it specifically and singularly exists to enforce. (There is no such thing as a government which does not assume that man is a collective AT HIS METAPHYSICAL ROOT.) Incidentally, “absolute subordination” is a redundancy. There is no such thing as “limited subordination”. To own a part of another is to own all of him, because man is metaphysically ONE, not a collection of parts. His consciousness is singular; his existential frame of reference singular, and therefore him SELF, the very thing which makes any aspect of reason or reality relevant and meaningful, is likewise entirely singular. Extrapolating logically, then, we can see that absolute subordination is really absolute sacrifice. And sacrifice means death. To attempt to own and control what is ONE, of itself and to itself, is to murder it.
Since the collective Ideal is in reality purely an abstraction, it, itself, can have no empirical, material maifestation. This abstract nature makes the Ideal infinite, for abstractions have no boundaries which the Observer, man, can perceive. In other words, the collective—the People, the Nation, the Culture, the Workers, the Poor, the Marginalized, even the Laws of Nature/Physics which GOVERN all things etc., etc.—exists purely in the minds of men. It’s not a thing. However, you will notice that collectivists, and apologists for the efficacy of government of all stripes, either explicitly or implicitly deny this. Underlying all their arguments is this premise: The Ideal has both transcendence (has an existence that cannot be directly observed because it is “beyond man”, so to speak), AND it has legitimate, completely objective, practical actuality, which is to say that it can be manifest in the material universe, which is to claim that it IS, itself, material. That which can be synthesized with the material must possess an inherent property of materiality…or at the very least the essences of the Ideal and material reality are not mutually exclusive, which means, for all practical purposes the same thing. So what they are saying is that the Ideal is and is not something which can be materially apprehended. This is pure doublespeak…but as the underlying arguments are at root entirely contradictory, its the best that can be done. Unfortunately, the best that can be done, rationally speaking, when tried in reality, makes for hell on earth.
So the Ideal, you see, is not merely an IDEA. It is an actual, but INFINITE, thing, which is beyond the RATIONAL capabilities and perception of any individual…well, any individual who has not received special enlightenment from the great beyond, so to speak. And this is the root contradiction which demands war. The Authority cannot rationalize THE COLLECTIVE IDEAL to you or me because reason is a function of man, and therefore is utterly insufficient to discern truth, which belongs WHOLLY to the transcendent Ideal. Reason is of man; but Truth is of the Ideal. And just like that, Truth becomes something which is no longer up for debate. It is what it is, and any questions from men are merely proof that by his very nature man is incapable of understanding. Reason is of man, and therefore debates, questions, objections, discussion, suspicion, doubt are all irrelevant and forbidden. Truth lay ONLY in the absolute and absolutely perfect and infinite Ideal, removed from man’s cognitive and perceptual powers.
Of course it’s really the other way around…man is the arbiter of truth. Specifically, reason (rational/conceptual consistency), a root property of man, is the plumb line. But an ideologue cannot be debated by definition. You obey an ideaologue or you die. And since government is an Ideal, so very many people die. The Holocaust was a government program, friends. And it could only have EVER been a government program. And the contradiction of an “EFFICACIOUS transcendent Ideal” is precisely why.
The ACTUAL subjectivity of ideals is not, by definition, tethered to the rational/objective world, and therefore the Collective Ideal always morphs into a sort of all-powerful, inexplicable, causal, and determinative force. Its inability to be falsified by its very absolute, reasonless nature means that it becomes a sort of “infinite Truth”—truth which serves as its own reference (a logical fallacy)—which can never be disproven because it is beyond question…because it is beyond man. No matter how high the bodies stack up, there is no truth but THE Truth, and therefore nothing changes until everyone is either dead or there is no more infrastructure left to transmit the power of the authority (government) to the masses. Usually it’s a combination of both—dead bodies and impotent authority.
The infinite and transcendent nature of the Ideal means that it can literally take on whatever definition(s) the Authority chooses, up to and including blatant contradiction. If the Authority says that there are five lights, then there are five lights. The fact that you SEE four is irrelevant. The truth is not up to you. It’s outside of you. The Authority…those men specifically enlightened (somehow) by the transcendent Ideal TELL you what you see, they don’t ask.
The Truth is OF the Ideal, and by extension its Authority (governement). But the “outside” material world, especially the individual, must be subdued and sacrificed because this “Infinite Truth” isn’t actually infinite as long as there is an “outside” of it. But by the same token there is no such thing as an “outside of” the Ideal precisely BECAUSE it is infinite. Of course this contradiction never causes governments to reconsider their assumptions, but instead becomes just the excuse needed to either openly or tacitly exert totalitarian control over everything and everyone. The contradiction is not reconciled by better ideas, but “reconciled” by destroying all that government deems as an imposter to Truth…which is anything “outside” of it. Which is everything NOT it. My existence, and yours, you see, is illegitimate. Your very consciousness is a lie. The lie which necessarily and unforgivably offends the Truth that is the Ideal. The only solution to the affront of your individual existence and your awareness of your singular self is death, ultimately. The goal then, of every enforcer of the Ideal—of every government—its to manifest its “legitimate” and “Infinite Truth” upon all, INFINITLY (absolutely…totally…totalitarianism). Which can only happen when all the liars—all who by nature utter the pronoun “I”—are dead. Individual consciousness is an aberration; an illusion; an alternate reality which is really a non-reality. The Ideal will wake up; and the You of your consciousness will fade like a vague dream come morning. At least that’s the plan. Hint: It never really happens. But not for lack of trying, as is evidenced by SO MUCH WAR.
Which finally brings me to the initital point of this article. ALL governements represent collectives. It doesn’t really matter the specific pedigree—racial, national, religious, cultural, economic, etc.. All collectives are Ideals. All Ideals are absolute and transcendent because all Ideals are abstract. All Ideals then are incompatible with anything outside of them, and by extension anything outside of the Authority (government),which exists to enforce the right of the Ideal to subdue all things as illegitimate, untrue, and irrelevant according to the infinity of ITS Truth. No Ideal then can accept the right of anything outside itself—which means outside of the Authority—to EXIST. Compromise then, if seen at all, is ALWAYS a feint; always a means to an end, and the end is ITSELF. All governments then, being THE Authority of THE Ideal, have only one objective when all is said and done:
Government, then, implies absolute control, and this implies war, whether overtly or through the ideological reprogramming of the “unenlightened masses”. Whether or not world domination can ever be practically achieved by a given government is a separate issue. The root philosophy points inevitably to total control. Total rule. Period. All Ideals are infinite; and all Ideals then will infinitely seek to destroy whatever they deem not of themselves. And they will do this through the power of government, because government is the REAL Ideal. It’s what actually has the visceral power to destroy. Government is not a figment. It’s real. and so are its guns.
Finally, keep in mind that this article is not dealing with the morality of GOVERNORS, per se, but merely government’s philosophical premises and the natural, inevitable conclusions. The goal of my work here is to merely enlighten as to the natural consequences of ideas through a rational and academic explication of premises and conclusions, not to condemn rulers as evil men. Most rulers are just people, like you and I. They truly desire freedom. My job is to simply explain why freedom and government are not compatible.