Unless objects relatively exist with other objects, they cannot exist at all. Because non-relative objects cannot be compared. And objects which cannot be compared cannot be observed, and thus cannot be conceptualized, and thus cannot be defined. For the presence of the observer would necessitate a comparison, at the very least between the observer and the object observed…because two or more objects cannot coexist and yet be exclusive of comparison. It is a rational impossibility. And this is why existence must be relative. If existence is non-relative then the comparison is impossible. If A is A because A qua A– that is, because A is absolutely A…A, infinitely so–no comparison could ever reflect the truth of A:
First, because A, infinitely so, or infinite A, must exist in a vacuum of itself. For as soon as A is said to coexist with, say B, where B is, say, the observer, then A cannot be absolutely A. For A has an absolute limitation which is revealed by the presence of B.
And second, because A already has an ABSOLUTE definition: Itself (A). So any conceptualization (definition) of A beyond ITSELF (Absolute Self) is an absolute lie..an absolute falseness. And what is absolutely false cannot be manifest in reality as though it were true. For it is absolutely–that is infinitely–false. It is absolutely untrue; it is absolutely unreal; and therefore it absolutely cannot be.
Relative existence necessitates comparison which necessitates conceptualization. And since comparison/conceptualization is purely a function of relative existence, A qua A makes A absolute and therefore exclusive of observation and, by extension, comparison, which means it cannot be conceptualized, which means it cannot be defined. And that which cannot be defined cannot by definition be said to exist.