Monthly Archives: July 2013

(A Response to Commenter OASIS) The Metaphysical “Transporter” or Calvinism: Scattering the existential molecules of YOU away from YOU, into the theological abyss.

Oasis,

You will love my newest post (see below…written today, just before this comment).

Anyway…I sense your struggle, and I am grieved for you.  I pray that you continue to approach the light of truth and love and true Christian understanding, and reject the darkness and abyss of Calvinism.  It is truly a wide road.  I pray that you NEVER again find an exit ramp back on to it.

Stay strong.  You are dearly loved.  Yes YOU are dearly loved.  In Christ, YOU, all of you, in your body and mind, are affirmed as GOOD.

Now a few words from our sponsor.

That would be me. 🙂

I understand that my topics, discursive style, arcane language, and rambling prose can be confusing.  I greatly apologize for that.  I am a wordy person, and it translates into my writing.  I always have like a million great points I want to make, and so I try to stuff them in, in as organized a way as possible.  Sometimes, it is an epic fail.  But…it’s the way I write.  I’ve tried to change.  And…at least its “epic”.

But, apart from my literary flaws, understand that Calvinism is exceedingly systematized.  It proceeds from demonstrably false assumptions and metaphysically/logically impossible contradictions, but it hides them with great finesse and intricate nuances of semantics (see how Wade Burleson concedes “free will”, without ever ACTUALLY conceding it at all; it is pretty impressive.  They often use euphemism, and outright shameless re-defining of words and concepts so that they fit nicely into the orthodoxy.  It is complete, concise, VERY organized, and extremely comprehensive.  Do not get down on yourself for feeling confused.  But remember…

Do you know what else it is?

It is FALSE.  You need to understand this:  the assumptions which drive the Calvinist doctrines cannot POSSIBLY be true.  They are wholly irrational.  Determinism is impossible.  There is NO non-contradictory construct or paradigm of existence where it can work.  It can no more be true than the sun can be made of buffalo hide.

In order for you to exist and God to exist and for relationship to occur and for all the promises of God and salvation and peace and love and pardon and redemtion to ACTUALLY be real, you MUST have unfettered access to your own volition, and you must at your core physical being be GOOD (rationally worth saving, because you have INHERENT worth), and your senses MUST be effective for apprehending your environment so that you CAN have a real and pragmatic and efficacious understanding of TRUTH.

And if there was a time you could concede the farce that is reformation theology, then you CAN concede this.  🙂

You need to vet EVERY Calvinist/reformed assumption by this idea before you ever, ever concede it and…hmm, you know what? Just NEVER concede their premises, ever.  Just flat out refuse.  They LOVE to define the terms of the debate.  Don’t let them.  Force them to rationalize the contradictions according to reason first.

Anyway, vet the assumptions/doctrines according to this:  does what I’m being told result in the functional expulsion of myself from myself?  Am I being asked to believe that I, in order for this to work, must not actually be myself?  If the answer to that is “yes”, then it is a false doctrine.  It denies not only YOU, but it must deny God.  Because if YOU don’t exist, then there is no way you can possibly argue for the existence of God.

Are you most affirmed by membership in a local church (i.e. a “collective”)?  You are removed from YOU, YOU are nothing more than the local church.  This is a false doctrine.

Are you a slave to your sinful will (Total Depravity)?  Can you NEVER please God by “your own strength”; can you never do good before salvation?  After salvation?  You are removed from YOU.  This is a false doctrine.

Are you told that the “best” way to please God is to fulfill your “biblical role” as a wife, mother, child-bearer (quiver full) homegroup leader, father, husband, missionary, tither, etc., etc.?  You are nothing more than the abstraction of “role”.  You are not YOU.  It is a false doctrine.

Does the pastor preach “free will”, but then declare that God is not obligated to save any “sinner”? (This is the Calvinist notion of limited atonement).  “What this means is that YOUR will, even choosing Christ is irrelevant.  The only will that matters is God’s.  This means that YOU are irrelevant.  As such, YOU cannot exist in the equation at all.  You are removed from the salvation construct.  It is a false doctrine.

Has your outcome been “predestined”?  Meaning, nothing you do can change where God has said you will go before you were born (which is an utterly irrational concept)?  Meaning all your works are moot; your will is moot?  (This is the Calvinist notion of “unconditional election”).  This means that you are irrelevant.  Meaning that in the salvation construct you do not exist.  You are removed from YOU.  It is a false interpretation of “predestination”.

Are “works in your own strength” ubiquitously and consistently condemned?

Are you told that “you only deserve hell”, because all YOU can do is “filthy rags” before God in your own strength (what I call the Transference of Depravity as Identity)?

Are you told that “God doesn’t need you”?

Are you told that all you have really belongs to God and you are merely a steward…meaning the product of YOUR work doesn’t belong to you, it is a direct function of God’s “grace”?  Meaning you cannot own your work and its produce, meaning you don’t own your work, meaning you don’t own the means to your work (body and mind)?

Yes, yes, and more yeses?

All of these doctrines you will notice do the EXACT same thing.  At the root of them is the idea that YOU are the problem.  That YOU are not really YOU at all.  That you both DON’T really exist, and that the “false” you that THINKS it exists is the problem (I tell you, the insanity will make your head spin).  That YOUR (false) existence is at the heart of sin and evil and why God had to send Christ to die?  That the ONLY way to truly know good is to spend your life rejecting YOU, in favor of some external abstract “role” or “doctrine” or “standard” or “obligation” or external “will” or force?

If the idea takes you out of the equation, it is false.

Get that down, and you will see just how easy it is to rip off the lofty and pseudo-piety and see the evil underneath.

Stay strong!  Don’t fret.  Jesus loves YOU, because YOU ARE YOU.

(Oh…and check out John Immel’s site, “spritualtyranny.com”.  A LOT of great information their.  It will help you immensely.)

More On the Unworkable “Logic” of Neo-Reformed Concession of Free Will (Part One)

(Please note:  For the purposes of this post (and most others on this blog), the term “determinism” or “determine” should be understood as PRE-determinism, according to the accepted metaphysical definition found in neo-reformed theology and its most comprehensive form, Calvinism.  Pre-determinism meaning that the outcome of one’s life is the function of a divine decision made without respect to the one or the one’s actions whatsoever, usually referring to salvation or damnation (but often including ANYTHING whatsoever in service to the doctrine of “God’s sovereignty”; and, further, made before you ever even existed. 

Yeah…trying figuring the logic out on that one.  You were determined before you were.  Hmmm…how does that work exactly?  It hardly seems possible to determine something before it exists.  Because before it exists it is by definition nothing.  So, er…the determined outcome of nothing must equal nothing.  Wait…did I just debunk neo-reformed determinism?  Maybe there is no need for the following post.

Oh…what the hell.  Can’t hurt. )

If man’s will is in service to and a direct function of God—and in this post I will demonstrate that both “in service to” and “a direct function of” are the exact same thing as it pertains to the neo-reformed/Calvinist doctrine of the divine pre-determinism of man’s salvation or damnation– then there is no rational way that it can be qualified as “free” in any honest sense of the word.  Attempts to do so are either deliberately or unwittingly deceptive, and can only be part of a carefully nuanced argument that at its core is logically unworkable; and demands the suspension of disbelief by anyone who lays claim to the reality of their own existence and/or the existence of God (for they are not mutually exclusive in the Creator/Creation construct…meaning one does not exist without the other). Which they must…for existence, being axiomatic, is an unavoidable prerequisite to any argument of any kind.  By definition, if you don’t exist, then neither can your argument.

And, to begin this article, part one, I want to focus on this:  The idea that those who believe in determinism must deny their own existence in order to do so.  And this is precisely the reason why those who accept determinism can never argue from any idea that can ever be consistent with their OWN self-affirmed beliefs.  If you are determined, then you are a perpetual effect.  You, and all you know and do can have nothing to do with independent will; and as such, there is no real you.  And if there is no you, you don’t have an argument to defend.  Everything about you is a forgone conclusion stemming from the absolute of determinism that can have, by definition, no beginning.  Determinism has determined.  Thus, everything is merely an effect.  Will of man can have nothing to do with it.

But even more than that, because determinism is an absolute, will of any kind can have nothing to do with it; that is, the determined outcome of your life, and all you do and know and are.  In other words, if man’s will isn’t free, then God’s will isn’t either.  Determinism is the ONLY force; the beginning and end.  Full stop.  For in this notion of divine determinism, God’s reason for the outcome (or “objective”, of your life) must NOT include anything to do with man or Creation–if it does, then it isn’t determinism; it is based (yes based) on an attribute of man or creation that must happen according to a wholly independent ability of man or Creation to act on its own behalf.  And if this is true then God’s determinism is conditional on something outside himself.  Aaaaaand if this is true, then determinism is based on the free will of man and/or creation to act, and thus, man cannot be determined because arbitrary actions of another are the root of reason for the objective, and the objective could not have been pre-known/pre-determined until the object (man and/or creation)acted FIRST.  And if it is man’s free will which must have acted first, then the objective is inexorably rooted in man’s free choice; it is not determined.  And if the act is a function of an inanimate, unconscious created thing acting according to its own ability to act in this way or that, then the objective is inexorably rooted in arbitrary inanimate action; it is not determined.  And if we claim that neither of these instances can be true in light of God’s absolute sovereignty over Creation and man, but that the objective for man is a function of God’s sovereign and free Will, then that Will, being utterly resistant to any form of object action outside of Itself, can find no basis in man or Creation.  And if that is the case, then God’s reason for setting the objective must be completely arbitrary…that is, a result of His OWN utterly unfettered free and wholly sovereign will.  In other words, God’s rationale for the determined outcome of your life is nothing more than Himself.  Because bereft of any outside influence whatsoever, the only definition for God’s will is GOD.  God’s will can have no other definition.   Which means that any reason for doing anything is predicated on His will, it is predicated on nothing more than HIMSELF. All “why?” questions return to:  God.  All how, when, where, what, and what if questions are likewise the same:  God.  God is the beginning and end of His own Will, and thus, God is the only reason that He does anything at all. (Seems a bit redundant then to throw man into the mix…and oh, it is; which is why human beings are disposable fodder for “doctrine” in the Calvinist/neo-reformed orthodoxy/orthopraxy.)

And if that is the case, then any divine Will effected upon Creation and Man, having nothing to do with either whatsoever, or anything else, must be completely exclusive to Creation and Man, and thus, must be totally arbitrary.  There can BE no reason because God would have to be the reason in this construct.  But God then must be a reason that is wholly exclusive to Man and Creation.  God’s “reason” is utterly removed from man and Creation.

Thus, the reason as it is applied to man and Creation has to be arbitrary because the only way it can be not arbitrary is if there is something in man or Creation that bridges the gap between God and the man and/or other Created object He has determined.  If the reason has nothing to do with the man or object determined whatsoever, then insofar as the man or object is concerned, the reason is again utterly arbitrary.  “God is God”  when applied as a reason to the divinely determined conclusion of an object or man can mean only one thing, again:  there is NO reason.  Because “God is God” is not a reason, it is a metaphysical, existential statement.  It is a metaphysical axiom that can have nothing at all to do with ANYTHING not God.  And thus, this being the deterministic rationale, the rationale is demonstrably false.  There is no reason at all.  The outcome/objective concerning man is arbitrary, and it must thus be set arbitrarily. And if the objective is set for purely arbitrary reasons, then the objective is not determined.  Because if something is determined according to NOTHING (i.e. no relevant preconceived criteria involving the determined object whatsoever), then it cannot be determined because NOTHING cannot determine SOMETHING.   And that is the problem in the Calvinist construct.  They ALWAYS want nothing to somehow equal something.  They want the utter removal of man from the entire process of salvation and existence to somehow equal an outcome that is actually efficacious to man. Via “election” and “predestination” man is both literally condemned for nothing and literally saved from nothing, and yet they still demand that we concede that somehow condemnation and salvation can actually be REAL and somehow can actually apply relevantly to man and his life. They want man to be utterly enslaved to a nature outside his will–which means outside his very SELF—be it the sin nature for the “evil” he “does”, the Holy Spirit for the “good” that he “does”, and yet concede that there can actually be an efficacious “joy” (heavenly pleasure) or “gnashing of teeth”(hellish pain and agony) by THE MAN.  But the man does not exist in anywhere in the entire equation!  So there is no MAN to DO anything or RECEIVE anything.

Behind the slick and intellectual façade, Calvinism, and reformed theology in general, is a logical and metaphysical fraud.  And this is truth:  It cannot possibly be true. 

So, once again, if we argue that man’s conclusion is determined, then God cannot have freely made the choice.   Something must have determined it for Him; either an outside force beyond Him (which must also be determined, by the way, as determinism is an absolute…remember?), or something in man or Creation was a root and undeniable matter upon which God decided to base the outcome of one’s life (meaning the “matter”, whatever it is, had to have happened FIRST, and FREELY)…in which case the outcome is not determined.  It is rooted in the free ability of man and/or Creation to act according to themselves, apart from God.

The Contortionist’s Theology: The slippery semantics behind neo-Calvinists concession of “free will”, and other logical fallacies (LydiaSellerOfPurple’s comment and my very long response)

Crazy-smart and ALWAYS welcome LydiaSellerOfPurple posted this comment today under my last post.  My response was so long, it warranted making the whole exchange a separate post.  In my response, I affirm Lydia’s observation of the confusing and ultimately incoherent “explanations” of Calvinist doctrine; in particular, the seeming concession of “free will”, as exemplified by Wade Burleson in an exchange I had with him on the blog “Wartburg Watch” the other day:

Lydia said:

Argo, I used to read Wade’s blog back in 2006-7 and came to the conclusion he was more antinomian than anything. Also, I think the Calvinist doctrine is pretty much embedded in his family history. Did you ever read about the letter AW Pink wrote his grandfather? (I think it was his grandfather…might have been “great great”)

But as time goes on and you read Calvinists you see they insert what we might call “free will” statements into comments or teaching. And these references negate what their doctrine teaches (or even what they said earlier!) so it gets very confusing. It is like they live in a cognitive dissonance and when you try to flesh it out there is always some wordy confusing explanation that really makes no sense or answers the actual questions.

Which leads me to Calvinism works on paper and from pulpits only. I have come to see this more and more clearly over the last few years. You cannot “live” out Calvinism without it causing tons of problems in the long run. The simple belief that man has no real volition starts to wreck havoc in practical application of beliefs! And then the leaders start to try and explain that you have freedom to sin but not freedom to accept Christ as Savior. It gets very strange. It is like a big black hole where green is red and sky is land.

The sheer confusion inherent in Calvinism makes it look intellectual at first. But if one is serious about it and digs in, it starts to look like institutionalized confusion and chaos.

I have come to think of Calvin as having a personality disorder. I get this from his behavior in life to his writings. He thrived on power, control and keeping people off balance. He did not suffer anyone to disagree with him including his close friends like Castillo whom he eventually banished and ruined.

It is like waking up one day and realizing you were following the dictates of Hitler without realizing it. The man was a creep and he systematized what folks are following today no matter how much they claim otherwise.

Argo said: 

Lydia,

John Immel says that Calvinism appeals to people because it is the most systematized, comprehensive, and organized version of protestant ideas.  While I agree with this, I think there is another reason…and it is the reason I find the doctrine has mass appeal for both smart and average-thinkers.  It is simply what you pointed out already in your comment:  the confusion.   Smart people enjoy yet one more chance to use their cognitive acumen to  “be in the know”, and dumb people like feeling smart by claiming a kindred spirit with “the know”.  And the “know” is even that much better when it is the functional difference between being on a path to heaven and the wide road to hell.  Damnation and life.  More importantly, YOUR life, and and the much deserved damnation for all the people you hate:  liberals, homosexuals, feminists, Obama, deists, Arminians and other assorted heretics, Catholics, atheists, MSNBC, R-Rated movie watchers, daters not courters, those who won’t serve on the UCCC (Urinal Cake Cleaning Committee), boys with long hair, and public school teachers…among others.

And because the theology is SO systematic…well, it just sounds so doggone intellectual.

Funny how it stops sounding intellectual and just sounds INSANE once you are finally able to apply this one simple truth to it:  EVERYTHING in Calvin’s doctrine…and I do mean EVERYTHING is designed to remove YOU from YOU.  To put YOU inexorably beyond TRUTH; beyond God, beyond salvation…even beyond damnation.  If you are anywhere around, even in hell, you are “doing it wrong”.

I think people just really, really enjoy believing they know something that other “ordinary” people don’t.  They LOVE to be the ones who have “truth”; who reeeeally understand.  They love being the ones who reeeeally know that up is down and down is up and black is white.  I think they feel empowered by this in some way…like they have some kind of uniqueness that impresses themselves, and gives them a mandate to somehow dictate the terms of reality for everyone else.

Also…now that I think about it (again), I think this is why so many scientists, particularly physicists, I have known are so doggone pretentious…possessing a sense of innate haughtiness which taints their persona’s, and they talk to the “regular” folks almost in something akin to parental tones.  They are just so giddy at the fact that they somehow understand the master and the strings; the “language” of the cosmos, which is hidden from the lesser minds.

So…like you said.  Confusing.  With confusing concepts and words that have just enough of a ring of truth and spoken with just enough “authority”, and systematic just enough..yes, this combination takes people right where they are dying to go.  To the place where they are special and smarter than everyone else who foolishly think that what they see is actually what is real.  And the really ironic part is that this kind of thinking is actually accomplished with doctrines like “total depravity”.  Have you noticed the level of arrogance displayed by those adhering to reformed doctrine?  They speak to you like you are a child; or worse, rebuke your “heresy” or block you from their blogs altogether.  As if somehow depravity doesn’t apply to them…as if, for some reason THEY are exempt from the depravity of the mind, and that through the mine-laden obstacle course of TULIP they have come out the other side with understanding.  Which, of course, is completely contradictory to their doctrine, which categorically declares that men can know nothing at all. There is no human agency capable of understanding GOOD; which is to say TRUTH.

But at the end of the day, for all of their pomp and circumstance, they are really third-rate thinkers.  The fact that someone as intelligent as Stephen Hawking or Leon Lederman–both Nobel Prize winners–cannot see the inherent logical fallacies in scientific determinism astounds me.  The fact that they cannot understand that you simply cannot claim that the TRUTH of things is this: TRUTH cannot be known, by definition, since all of reality is simply an EFFECT.

Scientific determinism makes every mathematical equation ever devised utterly moot before it leaves the gate.  All these great equations they use to “prove” their deterministic ideas are dead on arrival based on their OWN assumptions that everything is determined by natural law.

But if this is the case–that natural law “governs” (determines)–you cannot describe the cause and effect of reality because everything you observe is mutually exclusive to the CAUSE.  That is, the CAUSE can never be known because everything, including man’s very thoughts have already been determined FOR him.  If your reality–everything that ever is or was–is merely the effect, what is the cause?  They pretend to know, but by their OWN tacit admission understanding is IMPOSSIBLE.  They CANNOT know the cause.  And if they cannot know the cause, they cannot know that we are all determined.  If you don’t know what is determining, then you can’t claim determinism.  It just doesn’t work.  And you can’t use math to determine the cause, because math, by definition is part of everything that is ALREADY determined.  Mathematical proofs and physical laws are not cause, they are EFFECT.

It is a logic that doubles back on itself and destroys its own assumptions.

Also, I am shocked that they cannot understand that determinism is an absolute.  That is,  if everything is determined, then that which determines must ALSO be determined. You can NEVER arrive at any kind of cause…there is no such thing as something being determined by that which is arbitrary.  You cannot ever make the equation ARBITRARY + DETERMINISM = DETERMINISM  work unless you make ARBITRARY equal to zero.  And that leaves you with what?  Determinism.  Going back as far as the eye can see.

And the fact that someone as “wise” as RC Sproul cannot see the impossibility of a concept like “God controls every molecule” makes me crazy.  The fact that he cannot see that this makes everything GOD (according to Argo’s Universal Truth #7:  Anything which precedes directly from an absolute is the absolute), and utterly eradicates any line between God and Creation and ALSO makes man’s ability to then understand anything at all totally impossible, because man cannot EXIST in this construct…well, let’s just say I remain unimpressed with the turning wheels behind their eyes.  They could use some grease.

And the fact that Wade Burleson can say with a straight face and honestly believe he speaks the truth that it is his WILL by which he chooses Christ but that that his will is utterly UNABLE to resist God’s calling reveals just how little these men truly understand the world they pretend they can bring good to with such nonsense.  The fact that they won’t or can’t see the glaring rational larceny in such a view is staggering.  And they get PAID to preach ideas that are wholly irreconcilable with what can be true.  A will that is ALWAYS inexorably bound by something outside of it is NOT FREE.  If God is absolute, and our will is ultimately subject to HIS will, then what does Argo’s Universal Truth #7 say?

“Anything which proceeds directly from an absolute IS the absolute”.

If our salvation proceeds directly from God’s will, then our will plays NO part in the salvation process, period.  Further, our will MUST BE the exact same thing as God’s will, for we cannot function according to our will because his grace is irresistible…so by definition His will absolutely trumps our will.  We become God.

How hard is that to understand?  Really…you are going to nuance your argument to that extent…to blasphemy?  You need to go there, to the place where contradiction is the root of God?  That’s what the truth is now?  Lies?  Whether intentional or as a product of your elementary reason.  This is what Christianity is?  Irrational thinking?

Where is truth then?  Nowhere.  It is gone.

But see, this is the whole idea of irresistible grace and limited atonement.  Oh, sure…Calvinists have no problem conceding free will.  They’ll do it all day long.  Why?  Because, as always, they apply irrational, mystic, false logic to the definition.  They concede man’s will, but the ULTIMATE decision belongs to God.  In other words, man’s will profits him exactly zero.  It is ALL up to God’s arbitrary graces.  In the words of Wade Burleson “God is not obligated to save us”.

What I believe he is saying here is that whether you WILL Christ or not is irrelevant, because God gets the final say, and He is not obligated (I disagree completely with this; once Christ was sacrificed, indeed, He had obligated Himself to the salvation of those who would believe, otherwise He makes Himself a hypocrite).  THAT is the essence of limited atonement.  Regardless of what human will desires, God is going to choose who gets saved.  You can accept Christ all day long, but it means nothing to God.  YOUR will means nothing to Him.  You are saved by His will only.  And this of course means that your will isn’t free, because it amounts to nothing in the end.  Your life concludes where it concludes based on God’s will only.  YOU have nothing to do with it.  Even your belief in Jesus is meaningless.

Evil philosophy.

Of course, the REALLY wicked part of this is that it makes Jesus ultimately irrelevant; His sacrifice, pointless.  If believing in Jesus isn’t efficacious to salvation, but the sacrifice is trumped by God’s predetermined will, then of what use is the sacrifice?  It is of no use.  It means nothing.  God is going to save who God is going to save.  You were saved, not by believing in Jesus, but by God’s arbitrary will.  By definition if God is not going to save you based on your faith in Christ (choosing to believe), then belief in Christ cannot POSSIBLY MATTER.  Which means that Christ’s sacrifice cannot POSSIBLY MATTER.  It is neither here nor there. Believe if you want by your “will”.  It matters not to God.  God’s criteria is…well, who the heck knows?  Even HE cannot know.  It can only be utterly arbitrary. He cannot have a reason beyond Himself, and since He is an absolute, HE, alone, cannot have a set value…He is an INFINITE self.  ANY reason He has then can only equal God.  And as far as Creation is concerned, the functional value of that is ZERO.

Without real relationship, God can have NO reason for doing ANYTHING in Creation.  Because He is what He is…and if that is His criteria for His will–Himself–then the applicable value of Him applied to anything NOT him is nothing.

I have said all along that Christ does NOT make election possible, but election makes Christ MOOT.  And it does.

And so, here we are with Wade.  Saying one thing, but what he says isn’t really what he is saying (incidentally, this was the whole beef people had with me on Wartburt…claiming that I was telling them “that they believed what they said they didnt”; all I was doing is telling them that what they were saying wasn’t really what was being said).  He concedes certain things because the gymnastics of semantics, along with his “authority” as a “called” (gnostic) minister, allows him to twist reason in service to his “sound doctrine”.  I believe this is what is happening.  I’m not accusing him of willfully doing this…really, I think most of these guys are just not that deep.  They don’t seem to posses the intellectual fortitude to follow their ideas to the places they must reasonably go.  Or they don’t possess the will. Which makes sense, since they don’t believe their will effects much in the grand scheme.

But God only excuses ignorance so far.  After a while, as a teacher, you are supposed to know.  If you don’t, you are at best incompetent, and at worst a liar.

Okay…whew.  That was long.

I’m going to make this a post, LOL

Why Calvinists MUST Reject Calvinism, Regardless of Any “Good” or “Grace” They Perceive: God cannot ignore the hypocrisy

I have been going round and round with self-proclaimed Calvinsts on the Wartburg Watch.  One of which is–or…er might be?– Wade Burleson, the E-pastor for Wartburg’s E-church.  I qualify this with a “might be?” because I have yet to pin Wade down…his ability to subterfuge language is amazing.  He knows all the subtle ways to nuance his argument so that his doctrines are difficult to define objectively.  On one hand, he claims he believes in free will, but then on the other hand seems to defend the idea of God needing to compel that will to act…which of course is NOT free will.  The point is that I do not want to call Wade a “Calvinist” in the strict sense, but his ideas are definitely of Calvin, most apparent, the idea of Pervasive Depravity.  He and some other posters on Wartburg enjoy lauding the observable manifestations of “good” and “grace” they see in their churches, for following the very doctrines which I have shown to be wholly antithetical to human life.  Also, doctrines that I believe are categorically evil.

The following was my response to the idea of perceived “good” trumping the logical conclusions of the doctrine, and the metaphysical assumptions the doctrine lays as its indefatigable  foundation.  I have added some notes in italics for clarification:

Why Calvinists MUST Reject Calvinism, Regardless of Any “Good” or “Grace” They Perceive

For years and years I felt just like JeffS (one of the self-described Calvinist posters on Wartburg). I had heard some of the objections, but I easily brushed them aside because of all the “grace” I experienced and saw in the church. Then I saw how quickly the very same doctrines of “grace” could be used to scourge those who intended to question the “divinely appointed leadership”. Then the ugly side of Calvinism roared to the surface, and I realized from then on that doctrine was EVERYTHING. All actions are rooted in assumptions. And the more I studied and thought the more I realized that the MEN leading the church had not changed. The doctrines they believed had not changed. It was merely that the circumstances were such that only the “good” side of Calvinism was apparent (and because of my own evil decision to only see what I wanted to see). It was only when people in the church began to demand justice based on their OWN observations and convictions, rooted in the belief that they held some inherent self-worth that demanded it when I saw how, according to the same doctrine that had been preached for years, this could not possibly be true. Man has NO right to demand justice from appointed “elders in the stead”.

So, someone is wrong here. Me or Wade. Anon 1 (a highly thoughtful and very intelligent commenter who also rejects the Calvinist construct) or Jeff S. The doctrine says what it says, so someone is not understanding it properly.

I submit that what we EXPERIENCE is irrelevant. It is the assumptions that drive the teachings, the actions, that matters.

So, either Calvinist doctrine leads where it leads, and is rooted in metaphysical beliefs about man that are what they are, or it does not. And IF the doctrines are antithetical to human life, then we are obligated to reject them. What we experience is beside the point! Perceived “good” is beside the point! Objective good is all that matters! If the doctrine is evil, then how can we EVER stand before God and make excuses for why we “did not want to change”. If we say “because I felt, or I experienced”…we have made a mockery of morality. We have insulted God. We have decided that WE are in a position to declare what ideas are good and what ideas are evil based purely on our subjective experiential opinions. We have traded reason for madness.

And God will call you a hypocrite for violating you OWN doctrinal beliefs.

(CH. 4, PART 2)-The Boy Stranger: A free allegorical novel

           The boy returned home at dawn the next morning.  The reluctant, uncertain sun slid left to right on the horizon very slowly. There were two suns in the boy’s blurry eyes, and they came together and separated over and over, until he blinked them back into one.

            He went inside and went over to Lucy and knelt down next to her.  She wasn’t moving and he could not hear breathing and for one startling moment he thought she was dead.  He knelt and checked her and realized that she was only sleeping.  Her breath was raspy, but not loud.  Weak and very shallow.  The boy stood and looked at her.  She was almost as thin as nothingness.  She should be dead, the boy thought.  The heart cannot pump blood through bones.

            “Did you get your hand fixed, boy?”

            The boy looked up, startled, at the sound of the satisfied voice.  The man mother had brought home the day before was there, at the edge of the hallway which led down to the bedroom.  The boy had not seen or heard the man when he walked in.  The man was very quiet.  All men like him were quiet men most of the time.

The man was rolling his white sleeves down and putting on his cuff links.  His black coat and black hat were on the chair near the window.

The boy was very surprised to see the man outside of the room.

They usually did not come outside of the room.  Except to leave.  And they never stopped to talk.  This man talked a lot for a man from Dakota Inc., the boy thought.  He was not as quiet as the others.  And it was strange to the boy.  All the talking.  He did not like all the talking that the man was doing.  The boy did not know how to respond to the man’s words; the words that fell dead on the floor at the boy’s feet before they even reached his ears.  The boy tried to find answers for the man’s dead words, but all he could think about was the gun that was tucked tightly in his belt.  He could feel the handle pressing into his stomach.

The man looked at the boy and smiled at him with something like acceptance.  Acceptance and fearlessness.  The boy felt like a melting candle.  The flame was there, and sinking down and down to the metal base. Why is the man talking, the boy thought.  They do not talk.  They only leave and come back again.

“Yes, my hand is clean.  There is no stinging,” the boy said.  Lucy did not stir.

“Where is the bullet?” the man said.

“I don’t know.  It went through my hand.  Maybe through the wall.”

“You don’t have it?” the man said.  “Oh, yes.  I remember now.  Yesterday.  Yesterday you told me it was not in your hand. We spoke briefly about the bullet.”

The boy stood.  “All bullets are brief,” he said.

The man nodded and looked down to adjust his cuff links. “Yes, they are impatient.  It is the afterwards that drags on and on.”  He sighed and put his hands down at his sides.

The boy tilted his head and looked strangely at the man.  “Is this why so many bullets are needed?”

“Needed?  No. It is why so many are possessed.  Men are fickle.  They do not know what they need.  The only solution is to have an abundance of everything, just in case.  Nothing lasts.  Everything is brief.  The first bullet could be the last bullet, but there’s no way to know.  So we have many.”

The man stopped and the content look on his face vanished.  For a very brief moment he looked at the boy and looked uneasy.

The boy nodded and turned his eyes away from the man.  He looked around the room.

“This bullet is outside my hand,” he said, pointing to his bandage.  “It is somewhere around.  If I find it I will let you know.”

“No. Do not tell me.  Do not look for it.  Wait.  Where is the bandage your mother said to bring home?”

“I left it with the doctor.  I remembered eventually, but it was too far to go back.”

The man nodded, and his uncomfortable look softened.

“So you left it in Shadow, and you ignored your mother?”

“I left it, and forgot what she said.”

The man nodded again.  He understood something of bloody bandages and leaving them behind and forgetting promises and the words of his mother, and his friends, and some other people he had known along the way.

“I must got to Shadow,” the man said. He walked over to the chair, his boots making a heavy, hollow sound on the wooden floor, and his spurs chiming like a triangle at dinner time.  He put on his coat and hat.  “You may stay and look for your bullet.  Whatever.  We will be back when your mother comes for us tonight.  You can do whatever you like.  Come into Shadow, and get some things if you like. You will not need any coins.  Dakota Inc. has plenty of them if you need them.  But soon you will see that coin or no coin, it will not make any difference.”

The boy said nothing.  He was appalled at all the talking.

“I will be outside in the wagon, smoking,” the man said as he stood at the open front door with his back to the boy.  “Your mother can come to take me back to town when she is ready.  I’m in no hurry.  I might take out my gun and shoot around to pass the time, so don’t worry if you hear it.”

The boy said nothing.  Worry.  No, he would not worry about all the shooting.  He could fall asleep to the sound of bullets.  But the talking.  This man talked too much, and the boy did not know where it came from.  He did not think the man did, either.

“Mother will be out,” the boy said.  “But she is tired and moves slow these days.  If you run out of bullets, maybe there will be another way to pass the time.”

The man gazed out at the South Dakota dawn. He grunted and nodded, then walked out.

The boy’s face went white and he stared without blinking for a long time.  He couldn’t move.  He was part of the floor of the drafty ranch house and stuck in South Dakota.  Then, he closed his eyes and remembered the blue soldier. He was sitting there on the log in the night, leaning on his musket with its barrel to the ground.  Comfortable, and watching the fires in the distance with weary eyes, and the boy came up behind him with the knife. It was all so quiet.  A quiet memory for both of them. For the boy, it stung his mind like lightning without the thunder.

The boy went to the window and watched the man from Dakota Inc. through the wavy glass.  The man pulled out his pistols and began firing them all around.  Into the air, into the ground, into nothing.  After a minute, the boy ran over to Lucy.  He shook her by her shoulder, which was as thin as the end of a broom handle.  He shook her roughly to wake her.  Perhaps too roughly for her health, but he was frantic.

“Lucy, wake up!”  he hissed, turning his head to the window where the shooting continued.  “We must leave. We must go now.  I don’t know where.  Maybe to the mountains.  Not back to Richmond because the only way back there is through town.”

He stood up and ran to the window.  The man was sitting on the wagon.  He was checking the bullets in his pistol, spinning the chamber deftly in his palm. The boy turned to Lucy.

“I will go and get mother.  We’ll leave now before more men from Dakota Inc. come.” He paused and his voice got quiet. He pressed his hand to the cold glass of the window.  “And they will come.  They will come by nightfall, if not sooner.  Several of them.”

He ran back to Lucy and knelt down beside her.

“We will go now, and leave the great trunks.  There is no time, and they are too heavy.”  He sighed and caressed his sister’s shoulder gently.  “It will be okay.  We don’t need them.  We’ll bring your quilt, and I can give you a coat.”

Lucy did not move.  Her head was buried under the colored quilt.  She opened her eyes, but she did not speak.  She looked out the little fuzzy holes in the quilt and saw that the front door of the ranch house was hanging open slightly.

She could see part of the wagon and she saw the man sitting on it.  He had two pistols in his hands and he was firing them across the plains of South Dakota.  Neither Lucy or the boy were startled by the shooting.  The boy continued to speak urgently to Lucy, and she continued to lay and stare out at the wagon and the man from Dakota Inc..  After a moment, she smiled.

A few minutes later the shooting ceased.  The man was out of bullets.  He put his pistols back in their holsters and pulled out a cigarette.

***

Mother would not leave the bed.  No matter what the boy said, she would not leave. Not for the boy, not for the man outside or for any other men from Dakota Inc..  Not for Lucy.  Not for Richmond.  Not for herself.

Mother was lying naked and still on the bed.  Her blood had become the temperature of the air in the room, and she could feel nothing. The boy averted his eyes and pulled the thin sheet over her.

“No, I will not leave with you, Jason.  They will have to come and take me away like they took father.  I will no longer go out to them.”

The boy pleaded with her, but she just shook her head.

“Cover my face with the sheet, Jason.  Everything is cold.”

But the boy did not.  He took her by the arm instead and began to gently pull her from the bed.

“No!” mother screamed, and jerked her arm back.  “Do not pull me!  No more of this, Jason!  Do you understand?  No more!”

The boy let go quickly and stepped back.

“Take Lucy and go far away,” mother said, her voice quiet again.  “Go cover yourself in the ocean if you must, but don’t go back to Richmond.  Don’t go back through the town.  Go the other way.”

The boy nodded sadly, but he did not bother speaking.  He took his hat from his head and put it to his chest and walked towards the bedroom door.

“Jason.”

The boy stopped.

“You cannot go back to Shadow ever again.  There is no good reason to go there.  There are other places, understand?” mother said.

“Yes, mother.”

“I know Dakota Inc. will try to give you a reason.  But the only reason they can give is themselves.  In Shadow there are no slaves to free.  There is no new country to build.”

“Yes, mother.”

Mother nodded and closed her eyes.  She turned her head towards the ceiling.

“No. No good reason at all.  In fact…” she paused and a little smile came to her face.  “All I have learned from this place, Jason, is that it is both the beginning and end of reason.  But who can live like that?”

She laughed a little.

The boy began to cry.

Mother did not seem to notice.  She continued speaking with her closed eyes to the ceiling.

“So go over the mountains.  But you cannot give that man the wagon and the horse. Oh yes, he will try to keep them.  He will try to take what he wants, but he must only take what you give him this time.”

Then she turned her head and opened her eyes, and her dark, red eyes were like bullets, and hot.  The boy’s tears began to dry as he looked back at them.

“And you can give him anything, Jason,” she hissed.  “Anything else you want.  Just not the wagon and the horse.  Do you understand?”

There was silence in the room for a few moments.  Not even the cold wind of South Dakota was blowing.

“Goodbye mother,” the boy said.  Then he left the room.

***

The boy walked past Lucy and the fire, and went to the open door of the ranch house. He stood at the doorway, off to the side, and watched the man some more.  The man was looking slightly impatient by this time.  He flicked his cigarette to the ground and pulled out a gold watch from behind his vest.  The man was in a hurry, the boy thought.  A hurry to get to Shadow, so that he could be in as equal a hurry to return to the ranch house.

The boy continued to watch him curiously.  After another moment, the man spat out a profanity and then threw his gold watch angrily to the ground.

Without turning to look at her, the boy told Lucy to keep her head under the quilt and to never mind what was about to happen outside.

“Pretend you are back in Richmond, Lucy,” he said.  “Or make believe it is the popping of the embers in the fire.”

Lucy whispered something back but the boy could not understand it.  And then there was something like small laughing and then only the sound of her breathing under the quilt.

The boy turned to look at her and he noticed that one of her bone-thin hands was sticking out from under the quilt.  He went to her and knelt down and took her hand.

“I must go out for a moment, Lucy,” he said.  “I am the smiling soldier that you dream of.  And I must go outside for a moment, but I will return soon.  And after I return all will be well.  All the fighting will have stopped, and my uniform will be clean, okay?”

There was a small laugh from under the quilt.

“And then we will leave this place.  I will be you soldier and I will come and ask for your hand in marriage and we will leave.  We will…we will go away to our honeymoon.  Yes, our honeymoon, Lucy.  Where everything will be quiet and sweet, like the smell of your fresh muffins.  And mother will stay here, of course, because she cannot come on our honeymoon with us.  Do you understand?”

There was another laugh. Then Lucy’s hand slipped back under the quilt.  The boy stood and pulled the pistol from his belt.  There was a little stinging under the bandage in his hand from where the gun was pressing on it, but mostly it felt okay.  He turned and went to the door of the ranch house, but this time he didn’t stop at the doorway.  He walked determinedly out into the fresh South Dakota morning, directly towards the man from Dakota Inc., who was still sitting in the wagon.  As he walked the boy stretched out his hand and pointed his pistol at the man, and held it very steady at the man’s heart.  He continued walking until he was right next to the wagon and pointing the gun up at the man.

The gun was high.  It led the boy as if it were his own head.  His body simply followed it around and did what it was directed.  There was no face.  Just a gun.  A floating, faceless gun.

The gun was very steady.  The boy learned that much from the War of the States.  The boy once heard one of the older boys say that if you raised your hand and your gun was not steady, then you should simply turn the gun around and shoot yourself so that you could at least be sure of hitting something.  Better that than make a waste of it.  The boy had no intention of making a waste of it now.

The man turned to the boy.  He quickly went for the guns in his holster, but then he remembered he was out of bullets.  So he did not bother taking hold of the guns.  He just held his hands over his holsters.  His eyes looked lost for a moment, and they wandered around frantically along the ground and then out to the horizon as if the man was looking for something but not finding it.

“You must leave right now and you must leave on foot,” the boy said.  “Mother says you cannot have the wagon.”

The man could not see the boy’s face too well from behind the gun so it was hard to read his eyes.  This was too bad, he thought.  Hard to know for sure when you can’t see the eyes.  But he thought he knew the boy pretty well from their earlier conversations.  He was not yet convinced he needed to be too worried.

“Your mother will take me into Shadow.  Then I will leave,” the man said.

“She is not going to Shadow.”

The man thought about this.  After a minute, he nodded.

“I see,” he said.  “I see that you have found your bullet after all.  Truly, you must be a rare kind of fool.”

“I’ve heard it before.”

“You have no idea what you’re doing.  Shooting a man.  You think that’s all?  Then you get to keep your wagon and a couple of women, and I am dead right here in your front yard?  Then that’s the end of it?  You could have stayed in the east, for that kind of foolish thinking.  You outsiders are all the same.  You never understand what it means to fit in.”

The boy was taken aback by this a little, and the gun wavered.  Then the boy closed his eyes and shook his head.  The gun steadied.

“I know what I’m doing,” he said, and opened his eyes.

“Boy, you would not be here if you knew what you were doing.”

The man sighed and sat up straight and looked around.

“No one would be here,” he muttered.  And then, “Richmond,” he scoffed and threw his cigarette to the ground.

The boy shook his head.  He turned a little to look at the ranch house, then quickly turned back to the man.  “I am sure there are a lot of words for you, but I don’t have time.  I’ve got…I’ve got questions.  But there is just no time for you, man.  Just leave.  Leave, and leave the wagon.”

“Your mother told you to shoot me, did she?” the man said.  “Is that it?  Son, your mother is a stranger.  A stranger’s words don’t mean anything.”

“But the wagon means everything,” the boy said.

“A stranger’s words and a stranger’s face,” the man continued.

“I don’t care.”

“You don’t care?” the man asked.

“No.”

“Well, what do you care about, then?”

“My wagon.”

The boy’s pistol went off five times.  The man fell backwards with a burst of escaping breath that sounded like all of Lucy’s breaths put together from the day she first got the sickness.

The tired horse that was hitched to the wagon suddenly came alive.  Her eyes went wide and her head reeled up and she pranced nervously for a minute.  It was the sound of the bullets, which cracked upon the South Dakota air like a hammer on a railroad spike.

The man slumped forward, his white shirt beneath his black coat soaked with blood.  His body then fell forward and landed on the horse’s back, which startled the poor animal even more.  She jumped and shook and the man’s body slid off of her and landed with a thud on the ground.

There was blood on the wagon and on the poor, tired horse, but the man was gone.  There was no one to force the boy, or his mother, or the horse, to go back to Shadow.

The boy looked down at the dead man and was relieved.  South Dakota was rid of him, and the boy was thankful.  Ten thousand blue soldiers had burned Richmond to the ground and none of them had the feel of an enemy like this man.  The boy’s heart raced with fright, then slowed in relief, then raced in fright again.  He put his gun in his belt and took a few steps back.

A moment later he realized his bandaged hand was throbbing.  Then he remembered Lucy.  He must take his sister and the bloody wagon and go.  There was no time to clean the wagon.  No time to clean the horse.

He turned and ran back to the house.  He got to the doorway and stopped.  He thought he saw something.  He went to the window, then let out a frightened cry.  There was a face in the window, with an open, moaning mouth, and it startled him.  But then he realized that it was just his face.  The glass in the window was wavy, and the reflection was strange.  The boy calmed himself and closed his mouth and looked at the window.  Just his reflection.  But when he closed his mouth, the mouth of the reflection seemed to stay open.  Open and gaping and gray like the sky.

The boy remembered his sister again and ran back inside the ranch house.  She was still under the colored quilt, and staring out the door.  She was still smiling a little, and her blinking and breathing told the boy that she was alive.  The boy ran to the bedroom to speak with mother one more time, but she was gone.  She had left the bed, and the boy did not see her anywhere.

There was no time.

He ran back to Lucy and knelt down and pulled her gently but quickly from under the quilt.  She was not asleep, but she also wasn’t quite awake. Embers popped from the fire and landed in her hair and even some on her face, but she didn’t notice.  The boy brushed them furiously from her hair, and they smeared black on her forehead.  And he remembered his sister’s imagination and how mother always said it was like lightning.  But now it was only smeared embers on her head, and this made the boy angry.

He smashed his fists in the fire and this sent even more burning embers over his sister, onto her hair and face and quilt.  The boy screamed in fright and frantically brushed them from her, but the quilt was burning.  He flung it off of her and stomped on it until the flames were out.

He looked around for something to cover her with, now that the quilt was finished.  There was nothing in the room.  An empty tin cup.  The broom.  An open door.  The dying fire.  He ran to the back bedroom and pulled the blanket from the bed off of the floor where mother had put it.  He ran to the window of the bedroom quickly and peered out.  There was the mountain in the distance.  A clump of trees.  Gray sky.  Mother was nowhere.

He went to the room with the hole and took a pillow, moist with the morning dew, and also the blanket off the bed.  In the corner of the room was a coat stand and he grabbed one of his old, gray woolen coats off of it. Then he went back to Lucy and lifted her up gently.  She was shivering and coughing at this point, and her thin white nightgown was wet with a cold sweat so that it stuck to her skin like a paste.  The boy put the wool coat on her and also one of the blankets.

The boy noticed with fear that Lucy seemed to weigh no more than the gun in his holster. And she seemed every bit thin enough to fit into the holster as well.  Light and thin enough to carry on his hip.  What had become of her?  Her full lips were now like the flap of an envelope over her teeth.  Her teeth were stained red with the blood of her coughing.  Her hair was thin and sticky and stringy, and it was plastered in formless, unsolvable tangles against her pale neck and forehead.  She coughed and shivered.  Then she smiled, and she said “Yes, yes, why thank you, sir,” over and over again.

The boy carried sister to the front door.  In the corner of the room in the shadows he saw a corner of one of the great trunks.  But there was no time.  None.  No time to go pick through it to find anything useful.  Too heavy for him to drag to the wagon.  He left it where it was, untouched.

He took his sister and the pillow and extra blanket to the wagon.  He put his sister on the bench where he could drive the wagon and she could lean on him.  The other things he put in the back.  There was a sharpness on the breeze.  Winter was blowing down the mountain.  But they were going up, the boy thought…up the mountain to meet whatever they would meet there, winter or otherwise.  There was nowhere else to go.  It was the only place around that looked any different to him.  Everything else was the same.  Except for Shadow, which was a grave.

A blast of wind came upon them as the boy climbed in the wagon next to his sister.  The razor sharp cold cut at the threads of his coat and he shivered.  The horse lowered her head and shuddered and waited for her directions.

“Good girl, good girl,” the boy said quietly.

He turned to his sister.

“Lucy,” he said.  “What should we name her?  We have never given her a name.”

Lucy smiled and shook her head.

“I’ve no idea,” she whispered.

The boy turned away from his sister and stared straight ahead.  It was a long way.  He lowered his head and put up his collar.

“Good girl, good girl,” he said, then pulled on the reigns and they started.

The boy ignored the road that led toward Shadow and took the wagon around the house, out the back.  The horse still had the streak of the man’s blood across her back.  But it was browning now.  Drying quickly, and growing lighter and lighter in color, like the color of the South Dakota dirt, with each passing moment.

The man from Dakota Inc. still lay on the ground.  And face down with eyes open he examined, with the deep, deep interest of the dead, the ground beneath him.  When the horse started moving, one of her hooves struck the man from Dakota Inc.’s head, and pushed it down, crushed, into the dirt.  The boy just shook his head and held onto his sister.  No wonder the horse did not have a name, he thought.  She couldn’t tell a dead man from the road in South Dakota.  What do you call a horse like that?

Soon they were moving quickly away from the ranch house, bumping and lurching along, toward the mountain.  The boy hoped to reach it soon.  Perhaps they would stay there for a while in a shelter that he would build.  Maybe they could even stay there forever if they needed to.  Maybe no one would bother looking for them there.  Maybe no one ever went to the mountain.  Maybe it was just something South Dakota looked at to pass the time.  Or perhaps he and Lucy would see what was on the other side and keep going.

Lucy drifted in and out of consciousness and lucidity as they went.  She opened and closed her eyes slowly, like a drunk man on the verge of sleep.  At one point she looked down at his hand with the bandage as it held the reigns.

“You have come for me, but where is your flower?  The red flower in your hand is gone.  Am I too late?” she said.

“No, Lucy.  We have just left.  We have a ways to go still.”

“Oh.  Good,” she said with a sigh, her unfocused eyes closing again.  “Then it is you, my soldier.  And we are leaving Richmond, then.  And the war is over and we are off to be married, and I will bake you muffins and they will be sweet.  But then where is the flower you brought for me?  I could have sworn I had seen it.”

The boy felt very sad.  He tried hard not to cry.

“Lucy, you are not too late.  We are still in Richmond, and are not quite away yet.  And the war is not over.  So there is plenty of time to bring you more flowers.  As many as you want.”

Lucy sighed and smiled.

“Then I am not too late,” she said.  “Thank you Jason.  The soldiers are still to come in their very clean uniforms.  And when I awake I will be married, and I will cook for my soldier and he will bring me flowers.”

“Yes.”

“I love you, Jason.”

“I love you, too.”

More flowers, the boy thought.  Flowers everywhere.  In the hands and on the ground and in the eyes and on the wagon and everywhere.

Denying the Trinity on the Basis of the NUMBER, Not the Persons: Argo’s concept of the infinite quantity of the infinite singularity (whole…or “one”)

I have said this before and I continue to hold it to be an axiom:  Math does not create reality; math simply describes it.  Values and numbers are functions of man’s ability to abstractly define his environment for the purposes of explaining it and organizing it in the interest of taming the chaos.  Values and numbers do not drive the motions of objects.  This is a lie both knowingly and unwittingly foisted upon the world by scientists who, whether they recognize it or not, hold as the foundations of their knowledge a purely Platonist philosophical mindset.  But to the contrary I submit that objects act according to their own ability to do and be FIRST, before man can ever seek to apply a mathematical/numerical construct to it in order to describe them. This is an absolute fact of the universe.  Show me a law which precedes the motion of an object, and I will show you a religious shaman in a lab coat with horn rimmed glasses and speaking of proofs and theorems and tensor calculus.

When we speak of the “Trinity” in our churches, we speak of an understanding of an idea which is rooted in this “cart before the horse” fallacy of abstract theoretical ideas being the fathers and mothers of the tangible objects we observe.  We fall prey to the Platonist understanding of the world, where reality isn’t real and what is really driving the bus is perpetually beyond us, in some sort of “spirit” world which can be neither seen nor heard nor felt because it is mutually exclusive to our reality.  But nevertheless it is there…it is TRUTH, and only those people specially gifted (divinely dispensed) with pre-ordained knowledge possess the ability to explain our world to us.  In this unique case of numbers, the mathematicians are those who were born into the world with the divine insight…able to parse the universe into categories of mathematics and theoretical physical laws in order to explain that what we see isn’t what is actually real.

 And as good little scouts  in the barbarian masses we nod and proclaim them the geniuses to a divine degree.  Of what use are our senses when we have Einstein and Hawking and Lederman and Planck and Higgs to interpret the “truth” of our reality with their sizeable brains, in numbers and formulas that only a very small number of very strange (read:  ”holy”) people understand?

And so here is what we do.  We put three bananas on the table in front of our little rug rat and explain to him that there are “three bananas”.  And what happens is that after a while the number three becomes the plumb line for that child’s reality…along with other values.  So that from now on every time he or she sees a grouping of anything of three, he or she will see the three and the objects as utterly inseparable.  A singular manifestation of a singular reality, when in fact, that is not the case.  The number three is not actual.  The objects ARE.  And yet henceforth man is compelled to concede that NUMBER and OBJECT somehow exist as a complete and singular manifestation of his or her reality.  Even though physical objects and abstract ideas are, in reality, utterly mutually exclusive, and can never be combined in a physical sense.  That is to say an ACTUAL sense.

Before I go any further I want to preface this by saying that I wholly deny Plato’s idea of “forms”.  Meaning the abstract “idea” of a thing, like “banana-ness” is the reality which allows man to formulate a concept of “banana” by looking at the real and physical but imperfect representations of this “form” in his environment.  For the sake of argument, let’s indeed assume that the bananas in question are categorically identical to one another…but let me be clear.  I do not accept that the concept of “banana” is anything more than that:  an abstract concept.  And that the actual manifestations of banana that we see with our eyes is what drives the concept.  In other words, the bananas are real and the concept is not.  The concept is an illusion of man’s abstract mind.  But for my purposes and in order to make my point, we will assume that all bananas are the same.

So, in the case of the child and the three bananas on the table, there are and can be three only AFTER “banana”, the infinite quantity of the infinite whole, or one (a concept which is of supreme importance to my argument) are placed in a grouping which coincides with a previously accepted, consensual agreement of a wholly theoretical concept:  the concept of three.  A concept which reason tells us does not actually exist outside of the physical object (objects) which can then labeled and limited abstractly by this concept.  A concept which would otherwise be absolute, infinite (undefined) and meaningless.  The point here is this:  which comes first, the bananas or the three?  For without man’s mind, there is no such thing as three.  There is only “banana” (and even this is really insufficient to describe my point because I’m forced to use language, which also does not exist without man).  And banana, outside of the theoretical concept of number which is purely a function of man, are just “banana”, whether “one” or “many”.  There is no number of bananas, there just IS.  Bananas themselves are VALUELESS without a self-aware observer there to organize them abstractly.  One banana is two banana, is nine banana, is a billion banana.  The very concept of “banana” itself is infinite without the self-aware observer.  There is just an IS…a physical manifestation of some THING, without limitation, without number, without value.  The amount of the thing is irrelevant if we are discussing the same OBJECT.  There is no rational distinction between ONE object and a million of the SAME object because the object, strictly speaking, is only limited as a function of man’s ability to see it and apply some kind of conceptual meaning to it which he can then agree upon with other men in order to form a mutually effective co-existent relationship.  Apart from that, a banana is what it is what it is; and bananas are what they are what they are, and there is no actual difference between them.  One or a thousand, it amounts to the same idea:  banana.  Whether one or a thousand, there are all the same IS:  banana.  Outside the context of an abstract mind, the infinite IS, banana, cannot be given a value.  There cannot actually BE one banana; and there cannot actually be four bananas or a million.  There can only be “banana”, regardless of how “many” of them exist.

Now, this is not a case of redundancy.  It is simply an illustration of the infinite nature of objects which are identical when they are outside of man’s abstract mindset.  There may not actually BE a redundancy of “banana”.  Some are on the tree for the monkeys.  Some on the ground for the rabbits or whatever.  What I am saying is that actual “groups” of an IS is not logically contradictory.  You can have more than one IS which serves a practical purpose, but which does not contradict the singular IS which is the infinite “self” of the object which may logically exist as identical “selves” .

In other words, SELF is infinite.  Bananas are a form of self, and the self is infinite to itself, with a strict boundary between what is “banana” and what is NOT “banana”.  With that said, because the self of banana is infinite, it cannot be given an actual number or value, but it CAN exist as physically separate manifestations of the same self TO a practical purpose.  So, it is utterly logical that with the concept of infinity, one MUST equal many, and many MUST also equal one.  There can indeed be a physical distinction, but not a NUMERICAL distinction, because numbers are nothing more than an abstract label conjured up by man’s mind.  So, it is no more rational to declare that there can be only ONE of an infinite IS than to declare that there can be an INFINITE NUMBER of an infinite is because by definition that which is infinite cannot be limited by VALUE, because VALUE or number implies a limitation to that which cannot be limited because it is infinite.  The only thing real about an infinite singularity (or self) is how it manifests itself physically, whether in the applicable “form” of “one” or of “many” or of both one AND many, which is actually the only logical conclusion…that an infinite singularity can and must be BOTH one and many because any other assumption automatically ascribes a number/value to the infinite object and thus becomes logically contradictory.  Therefore, an infinite object can manifest itself, and will, in reality as both many and one, whichever is most efficacious for whatever action it is engaging in.  I think of the wave/particle duality of light.  In one circumstance, it can function as a singular infinite “light”, and in another it can function as “particles” of light.  Now, light is particles…and these particles are massless and identical, and thus they must logically function as both many and one in order to be non-contradictory to their infinite nature.  In fact, if I’m not mistaken, modern physics assumes the wave/particle duality for all particles.  This, in my opinion, is due more to the fact that they are identical, and not a function of mass.  Meaning, objects with mass also constitute a singular infinite IS provided they are physically and/or metaphysically identical.

This is a hard concept to grasp, I know, but the point is that when we are speaking of that which is infinite, we must understand that this does not mean that a numerical value is applicable.  It is NOT.  ANY number, one, three or a billion contradicts the notion of the IS being an IS.  An IS is not a number.  It is whatever it IS manifest in our observable world.  Just as is the case with the wave/particle duality, observation is everything.  And the idea of numerical one or many only exists and is only relevant when a self-aware observer is present.  (And this means that existence is ultimately relative between “selves”, or “is’es”, but we won’t get into that now.)

And this of course brings us to God.  I do not deny that God is Spirit, Son, and Father.  What I deny is that this constitutes a “trinity” because I deny that an infinite self can be given a numerical value, particularly when it isn’t logical or relevant to do so for the efficacious organization of our world.  God is ONE is the metaphysical statement which provides all the TRUTH we need to relate to Him, regardless of how “many” manifestations of the infinite God we observe.    Add to this fact that, by definition, if something is infinite than ANY manifestation of it must be considered ALL of it, in accordance with Argo’s Universal Truth Number Six:

“Anything which proceeds directly from an absolute IS the absolute”

…yes, add this to the argument (so this makes God’s “finger” in Exodus ALL of God, and the fourth person of the “trinity”, for example), and you can easily see why the concept of God as a “trinity” is both irrational and irrelevant.

(CH. 4, PART 1)-The Boy Stranger: A free allegorical novel

Bullet Three

Mother sat on the edge of the bed in the main bedroom of the ranch house and looked over the pages of the play that father had been writing.  It wasn’t the one that he intended to write, the one about his coming to South Dakota.  That one he never got to.  He was taken away by Dakota Inc. before he had a chance to start it.  The one that mother was looking at was one that he had written during the War.  He had written it to keep his mind on the things of Richmond, and to take it off of the killing that was going on north and south of the great city, in fields and over hills which, at the time, were far enough away to not be real, but close enough not to be a just dream.

Mother remembered how he used to sit in his chair near the window and sip his warm water, the half-finished pages of his play turning uselessly in his hand, his face turned to the window.  He would just stare for hours at the street beyond the glass where all the people walking—people he knew even from his youth—turned to strangers before his eyes.  He looked so sad, mother thought, as tears formed in her eyes.  How do you get over sadness like that?  Do you move to South Dakota?  Does that help?

Perhaps, she thought.

Perhaps it is the only way, in the end.

She looked down at the foot of the bed.  There were father’s boots, still neatly placed together.  Empty.

She turned again to the pages in her hand.  The last few were blank.  There was no ending to the play.  There was no ending because there was simply no ending.  The War  took care of that. The new play was to have started in South Dakota, but South Dakota was endless as well, mother thought.  Endless, all the way even to the ocean.  For it is all South Dakota, she thought, and then you fall into the water and are buried, and so even the oceans might as well be South Dakota.  Yes, there was truly no end in sight.

Without an ending, all of the pages might as well have been blank.  They might as well not have been written at all.  Mother remembered the pages of the newspapers, and the pages from the books that blew down the streets when the blue soldiers came, popping with sparks and ash, burning all of their pages blank.  She took father’s play and went over to the fireplace where Lucy was resting beneath the colored quilt and threw it in.

Then she went to the chair near the window and stared out at the plains beyond.  Lucy began to cough and shudder, but mother just stared and stared.  Soon, her eyes became blank.

Father was gone, and Jason could no longer work.  Dakota Inc. had forbidden it, and so he no longer went to the casino to work for Van Carlo. He spent his time hanging out near the ranch house, usually out back, brushing their one horse that pulled their small wagon, and speaking to her in quiet, gentle tones.

Mother was afraid that soon they would also come for Jason.  The boy was still strong, and useful, and if there was any chance of them getting paid, it would be through him.  And so the boy would be worth quite a lot to Dakota Inc.

‘Yes,’ she thought, ‘surely they will come for the boy soon.’

They would come with their remorseless faces and all their guns, and there would be bullets, bullets, everywhere.  Bullets in the bread and bullets in the soup and in the feed for the horse and bullets everywhere that would go down the throat the hard way.  So the best thing for the boy would be to stay out of sight; to never go out, and never, ever go into Shadow, and hope that enough time might pass that Dakota Inc. would forget about him.

‘But I can still work,’ mother thought.  There was a room in the ranch house with a hole in the ceiling where the boy never slept anymore. The boy only slept outside, on his back each night, his hands behind his head and staring up at the moon; and Lucy stayed under the colored quilt and could not move anymore because of the coughing which clung to her like a thin, damp nightgown.

Mother remembered a watch she had in a drawer in the bedroom.  It was broken and no longer told time, but it was made of gold and still worth something.  She stood up from the window and went to get the watch.  She’d use the watch to buy something so that she could work in the only way a woman like her could in Shadow.  The fair-skinned women in town said that the smoke made it easier, but the smoke cost money, and that was the reason she needed the watch.

Whiskey was available, too, and easier to get, and she wondered for a brief moment if she should try whiskey instead of the smoke.  But the problem was that she never really had a taste for whiskey.  Well, she actually did a little, before the war.  But during the war, they would give it to the soldiers when they had been shot through the arm or leg, just before they began to saw at the torn and ragged limbs, so now whiskey tasted like amputation to mother. No, she couldn’t even bring herself to smell whiskey anymore, let alone drink any, so it would have to be the smoke for her.

The fair skinned women told mother that the smoke would go into her mind and make her think about some strange things, but she doubted that they could be any stranger than the thoughts that were already in there.  She would join the fair skinned women in their work, otherwise mother knew there would be no surviving South Dakota, especially its winter.  And even with the work, it would be hard season for them to bear.

Mother went into town to see the fair-skinned women, and bought some smoke with her gold watch.  Then, each evening, just after the sun began to set, she left her children at home and climbed into the wagon with its one tired horse and rode to Shadow.  In the wagon on the way to town, mother would use the smoke, and then go and find a man to pleasure.  It didn’t matter who the man was as long as he was with Dakota Inc. Dakota Inc. organized the fair-skinned women, and Dakota Inc. men were the only men the women took into their rooms and their wagons and their tents.

So, for a few long and painful weeks–hazy, and void of form or reason–mother did this, but at the end of it there was still no money for the family to live on.  Because of her husband’s debt, Dakota Inc. took a percentage of what mother earned.  It was a very large percentage; practically all of it.  What was left over went for the smoke, and mother found herself beginning to use it more and more, until the boy noticed that the smell of it became like the smell of mother herself.  It was all around her, and announced her presence before she was even seen.  It came before her like an emissary, and it followed after her like the long train of a filthy wedding dress.

Every morning mother would sleep in late.  The boy would bring her some hot water and some bread for breakfast, but she would never take it.  It would sit on the bedside table as mother just lay there. Eventually, the man in the bed with her—there was always a man—would nod and smile at the boy and then reach over and take the bread and eat it himself.

“Much obliged,” he’d say.

They were different men from Dakota Inc. most of the time.  Mother did not really have any regulars, and though the boy knew that the men were always different, to him they all looked the same.  The same man, just dozens of them, all with different names.

After bringing bread and water to mother, the boy would bring some to Lucy, who was always laying by the fire under the colored quilt.  But she would never eat, either.

“Give it to the birds, Jason,” she’d say.

            “What birds, Lucy?”  It’s winter now, and I haven’t seen many.”

            “Ah,” Lucy said softly, her eyes closed, as they were most of the time.  “So they have not followed us from Richmond.  I see…they have kept going to the ocean, while we stopped here.”

            The boy told her that he didn’t understand.  Then Lucy told him it was angels; that she meant the angels.  Then she smiled and said that she was sleeping a lot these days and to never mind her.

            “It seems that I am the fool now, Jason,” she said, smiling. “Not you so much.”

***

            The next day the boy went to bring the bread and hot water to mother, but she was not in her room, and neither was the man from Dakota Inc.  He walked out of the bedroom and laid the bread and water near Lucy’s head, near the fire.

            “Lucy, I can’t find mother.  She’s not here, and the bed is made.  I don’t think she ever returned from last night,” he said.

            His sister responded, but he couldn’t tell what she said.  She was speaking in whispers a lot these days because her throat hurt from coughing so much, and she was so tired.  Also, her breathing was very raspy, like waves upon rocks.

            There was a small cup of water with a little sugar in it next to her head that the boy brought to her each night to soothe her cough.  The boy looked into the cup and noticed that the water was gone, but there was a small amount of blood at the bottom of the cup instead.

            His sister barely made a wrinkle underneath the colored quilt.  She was so thin; thinner than a ghost.  Maybe she was already a ghost, the boy thought.  She was the transparent pale of a ghost, and she certainly spoke like he imagined a ghost would speak.

            From the fire place some embers popped out and landed on the quilt.  They were not dangerous.  Just cold embers, and they quickly extinguished upon the thick quilt covering Lucy. One of them landed on a strand of Lucy’s hair, and it began to burn along it slowly until the boy reached down and squeezed it out with his fingers.

            He picked Lucy up and moved her back a little from the fire. She turned her head up to him slowly, but did not open her eyes.

            “Do not move me, brother,” she said in a whisper.  “I like the flickering light of the fire in front of my closed eyes.  It makes me think of Richmond during the war, and the popping of embers reminds me of the sounds of the muskets in the distance.  I remember when I would stand at the window with closed eyes, for I could not bear to look at all the burning.  And I thought that if I closed my eyes, I could see something beautiful instead.”

            The boy started to say something, but stopped.  He sighed sadly and moved her back nearer the fire.  Then he sat down next to her, and stroked her hair gently.

            “Lucy, I’m worried.  I am worried about mother.”

            After a long pause, Lucy responded.

            “I am in the kitchen with the muffins, Jason.  Mother is here.  The muffins have red frosting, and they are glorious. All the soldiers have returned and are smiling, and even their horses are smiling.”

            The boy looked confused.

            “Lucy, the kitchen is empty” he said.  “There is only a little bread and water next to you here.  There are no soldiers.  There haven’t been any soldiers for a long time. Except…” he paused.  “From what I hear, the blue soldiers are coming closer this way in South Dakota.  I do not want them here, to be honest.  But they will be here soon enough anyway, and it will be like Richmond again, and you won’t need the fire before your closed eyes to imagine it.”

            After a moment, the boy said, “Wherever we go, it seems the guns always follow,” He sighed again.

“We need to get out of here, Lucy.  Perhaps West, to the mountains.  I don’t know.  But mother has not returned from last night.  I hope she comes soon.”

            “No, Jason,” Lucy said.  “The soldiers have come home, for they came in the night, one by one.  All are tall and grand, and their uniforms are as clean as the day they marched from Richmond.  There is no speck of blood on them, and the only red is the frosting of the muffins, which mother has baked.”

            At that moment, the boy became angry.  His sister’s imagination had become greater since her voice became weaker.  She was spending too much time in front of the fire, just as she spent too much time in front of the window during the War of the States. He was angry at her and angry at himself for being such a fool.  He could not understand his sister, or her imagination, and he hated himself for it.

            He stood up in a flash and ran to the chair near the window.  There was a holster with a long barreled pistol hanging from it.  The pistol was from the blue soldier that he’d killed with his knife during the war.  He grabbed the gun with its six-chambered heart and turned it on his sister.  Perhaps this would open her eyes.  Perhaps this would turn her away from the flashing before her eyes, he thought.

            “Open your eyes, Lucy!” he screamed.  “And help look for mother!”  Then he raised the barrel up so that it pointed just above Lucy’s head and fired it into the wall. Each time he fired, he punctuated it with these words:

            “There is a soldier!  There is Richmond!  There is a soldier!”  And he fired until the gun was empty.

            “There is a soldier!  There is mother!  There is father!  And the muffins are hard and will smash your teeth to pieces when you eat them!  Now where is mother?!  She has not returned from last night!”

            Lucy shrieked in fright and covered her head with the quilt. Her body shook with violent tremors, and the quilt writhed over her as though wild horses were trampling upon it.

            “No, Jason!” she screamed.  “I have not seen her because my eyes are not open!  Ask the man! Ask father!  There is always a man in the house, and he must still be here!  There is always a man in the house!” And she sobbed heavily and continued to shake uncontrollably.

            The boy threw the smoking gun to the floor roughly.

            “No!” he said, grabbing Lucy. “The men mother brings are not father!  And this is not Richmond!  But I can make it feel like Richmond, by heavens, if you do not open your eyes!”  He wheeled and picked up the gun.  Then he pressed the warm barrel against Lucy’s forehead where it left a circular mark.  “Do you feel this?  This is the clean soldier!  This is mother and father!  Now help me!”

            Lucy put her hands over her ears and shook her head wildly.  And with all the strength she had left, she replied as plainly as she could.

            “I don’t know, Jason!” she cried.  “She is off with a stranger!  How can I know her place when all the men are strangers?!”

            The boy let go of her, and she collapsed, sobbing, to the floor, her limbs tangled awkwardly around and through the colored quilt.

            “She is gone, Jason.  Just gone.  She is not herself, and the man is a stranger and no one, and so we must make them something…something we can recognize. And it is up to us to do this because father is no longer here to help us.  And so I don’t care what you think or what you say, Jason!  I will see the very clean soldiers, and I will see the muffins and they will be sweet, because what else can they be?  What else?  There is nothing else!

            The boy recoiled at his sister’s harsh reply.  He sat back, almost as if pushed, onto the hard, wooden floor of the ranch house.  The heavy gun in his hand made a dull thud as it plopped to the floor, his limp hand still holding the grip.

            “And you, Jason, are a hypocrite,” his sister continued, her voice muffled as she buried her sunken face deep into the colored quilt.  “You…with a mind like a mirror pointed to the gray skies of South Dakota.  A knife?  You used a knife, and you think that makes you better than that blue soldier you killed.  And now you have his gun and you point it at your sister. You would just as well have left him alive and not taken it.”

            After that she said nothing, and neither did the boy.  There was no sound in the house except for the wind blowing through the holes in the wall, and the sound of his sister’s breathing, which was now like shallow creek water over very small stones.

            After a minute had passed, Lucy spoke again. “Jason?  Jason?” Her voice was a whisper.

            “I’m here, Lucy.”  And when the words came out, the boy was surprised to hear that his own voice sounded almost as weak as hers did.  He felt numb all over.

            “I forgive you, brother.  You are just an empty sack.  Just a fool, and a dullard, with an imagination like a crack in the desert.  But I will fill you, Jason.  With pure, white flower of high quality, and I will make the muffins, and they will be sweet, with red frosting.  And I also notice the flower you bring to me.  The gun, let’s say, is the green stem and the bullet hole through your hand is a red flower, a corsage, and you have come as a soldier for his bride.”

            The boy looked down at his hand and that was when the pain started. It was agonizing, like a storm in his hand, with piercing lightning.  If he was numb before, he wasn’t now, and he began to cry.

            He leaned into Lucy, and cried with many kinds of pain into the quilt.  Then he stood and ran to the kitchen and tore hastily a piece of kitchen cloth as a makeshift bandage.  Shuddering in pain and fright, he ran from the house, the pistol in his good hand and the storm and the blood in the other.

            He ran a few paces from the door, then stopped.  He looked out across the empty, quiet landscape and realized that he had nowhere to go.  Even in such great pain, there was no one who would take him.  He turned back to the ranch house and saw the new holes he’d created with his gun.  Then he gnashed his teeth in pain, and tore from the house in a sprint.  He needed to find a some place for his hand.  He needed to find mother, also.

            He got to the end of the road, then stopped and knelt over.  He was breathing hard, and the air that came out of him was as cold as the air that went in.  It was frigid in South Dakota, and the wind was moving.  There was no smell or sound upon it.  The cold wind carried everything away in the winter, like a silent train heading for the coast.

            Then there came a sound, and the boy looked up to see his mother coming in the wagon. There was a man with her that the boy did not recognize.  The boy stood as mother approached at a slow pace.  She stopped the wagon next to him and the boy looked at her but he didn’t know what to say or how to look or what to do.  He put the pistol in his trousers and clutched his hand and breathed hard. Then he looked at the man and hated him.

            The man looked straight ahead at the house for a long moment, and there was satisfaction in his eyes, as if he’d already gotten what he came for somehow.  Then he turned toward the boy and smiled.

            “Did you shoot yourself in the hand, boy?” he asked.

            The boy hated him. He wore a black suit with a white shirt.  Dakota Inc. kind.

            “I did, and it is very painful.”

            “It happens,” the man said.  Then he pulled a coin from his pocket and threw it to the boy.  The boy instinctively reached out with both hands and caught it, and there was a searing pain as the coin touched the wound.

            “It is a good day for me,” the man said.  “I knew this woman had a son your age that was working for Van Carlo.  I’d heard about this son, how he killed a blue soldier in Richmond.  We all thought there was a very good chance that one of us would see a bullet eventually.”

            The man smiled again and shook his head and chuckled.

            “Well, I’ve sure seen the bullet.  It’s right there in your hand.  So we’ll just head up to the house and do what we came to do, eh?”

            “The bullet is not in my hand,” the boy said.  “It went through it.”

            “Then it is lost.  And that’s just as good, I suppose.”

            The boy did not reply.  He looked with uncertainty and disappointment at the hole in his hand. The pain had subsided by this point. The hand had mostly gone numb.

            “Yep, it is a good day for me,” the man chuckled. “A boy who shoots his own hand will have trouble finding the bullet, I think.  If I were a gambling man, I’d say it’s not in him to find it.”

            “You are not a gambler,” the boy said.  “I’ve never seen you in the casino.  You are from Dakota Inc..”

            “I am from Dakota Inc..  We are all from Dakota Inc..”

            “But there was one man who did not have a black suit.  He came first, just a few weeks before you.”

            The man nodded.  “That was Jimmy.  I knew him.  He is dead now because he was not supposed to come.  He broke the rules.  So, you see, we are all from Dakota Inc., or we are not at all, understand?”

            “What rules?”

            “The new rules. Your mother is very comely, so it was important that we make new rules. We make them every day, it seems.”

            The man sighed and looked anticipatory and bored at the same time.

            “Take the coin,” he said.  “Go to town and see the doctor.  Tell him you are from me.  He’ll know better than to think you are lying.”

            Mother said, “When the doctor fixes your hand, bring back the bandage.  Do not leave it there.”

            “Who is this man, mother?” he said.

             Mother did not respond.  She just stared straight ahead at the ranch house and started the wagon moving slowly again.  After the horse, the tired horse, who moved with her head lower than her tail, had gone a few paces, mother turned back to the boy.

            “Do not speak to me again, Jason,” she said.

            “Trust me, boy,” said the smiling man from Dakota Inc.. “And go and fix your hand.”

            So the boy went to Shadow.  None of the men from Dakota Inc. bothered him as he walked down the street because of the coin in his hand.  He found the doctor and gave him the coin, and the doctor fixed his hand.  He worked without many words.  He just muttered softly under his breath and said “There, there, lad” in an Irish accent a few of times. “There, there, lad.”

            After his hand was fixed and had a new bandage he went back to the ranch house, but he left the old bandage at the doctor’s.  When he finally remembered that mother had told him not to leave it, he had gone too far and it was too late to turn back to get it.  Surely the doctor had disposed of the bandage by now, the boy thought.  Then he marveled at what a fool he was, and at how quickly he could forget mother’s words.

            The boy arrived home a few hours later and stood at the door of the ranch house.  But he did not go in.  He heard Lucy coughing weakly, and there was the now-familiar smell from inside.  The boy could smell it from under the door, and from around the top and through the weak spots in the wood of the door. Rotten. Meaty. Organic, but somehow unnatural. He turned away from the door and felt the odorless wind of South Dakota across his face.  The wind took everything away.  Everything.  The cold numbed his face to where he could not feel it and it to where seemed as flat and featureless as the very land around him.  He could not bring himself to go back inside the house.

            He went back to Shadow and wandered the streets.  No one from Dakota Inc. bothered him because they saw that, even though he no longer had the coin, he did have a new bandage on his hand.

(CH. 3, PART 2)-The Boy Stranger: A free allegorical novel

The Strangers gang rode out from camp, making their way slowly towards Shadow.  There they would stay for a while, just on the outskirts near the great rocks, then they would head for the mountain.

The hat Rifle wore was still acting like a bandage for his bruised and bloodied head, thanks to the pistol whip from Fire.  But his mouth hurt too, and unfortunately there was no bandage for his mouth.  Not even any bandanas like Leonard had to cover up the pain.  The only thing on his face was the large fish hook that bound his lips together.  But the fish hook was getting harder and harder to see as the blood began to build up and cake around it.

Behind his fastened lips was half a tongue.  The other half was back at camp, lying in the dirt near the opening of his tent which was still flapping.  The other Strangers had taken their tents with them, but not Rifle.  He left it, set up and empty.

 With half a tongue and lips bound together with a hook it was hard for Rifle to speak, or to cry, or even to breath.  So he said nothing.  He kept his eyes forward…so far forward that they seemed to drift far out in front of his head, just above the nose of his horse.  He looked this way and that, and thought about the fact that he would track this boy down, just as he had promised Leonard.  He would track him all the way to the top of the mountain if he had to.

The Strangers rode on and on in silence until the morning turned to dusk.  They were just silhouettes against the horizon.  The coat of Leonard, who was the last in the line of Strangers, billowed forward with the South Dakota prairie wind and threw an abnormally long and inconsistent shadow across his gang.

Rifle noticed that it was getting on nighttime, and once again he thought about resting in his tent on his bedroll.  He was tired, and could not help but to think of dreaming.

He thought about the fact that he had been dreaming more and more about the strange woman.  Not the woman from the Ranch house—not the wife of the fat man.  No, the woman he saw the other day.  He wondered what she was like, for he did not get to talk to her.  He wondered if her fingers were cold just like his own mother’s fingers were always cold because of the wind that came through the thin walls of their home in South Dakota, a long time ago.

But on that day, Leonard also knew that Rifle had seen the woman.  He told Rifle to forget the woman, she was helpless.  But Rifle could not forget her because she reminded him of his mother.  And that night he laid on his bedroll in his tent and he dreamed of his mother.  The next day he got up early and went out and looked around the camp and tried to find the woman again.  But she was gone, Leonard said.  Leonard was up early too, and had sent the woman away.

Rifle was very sad, and was angry with Leonard for sending the woman away, and not telling him and not letting him speak with her.  When Rifle saw the woman, things made sense to him.  Even Leonard and the Strangers and everything they did made some sense to him.  But this…this sending the woman away, it made no sense at all, and Rifle was very disappointed and angry.

It was that morning, after he had told Rifle that he sent the woman away, when Leonard told him that he and Fire would ride to the ranch house and collect the man called Holland for Dakota Inc.  Rifle was not looking forward to the ride because he would have a lot of time to be tempted to think about the woman he saw in camp.

He was tempted and gave into it.

The day went by and he rode on and on with Fire toward the Ranch house.  He realized that the strange woman was gone for good, and he found himself greatly missing her, and his own mother.

And now, as the Strangers gang rode to Shadow, and after they would go to the mountain, Rifle was missing his mother some more, and remembering how cold her fingers were when he was a little boy.  Cold from the cold wind of South Dakota.

All of the Strangers looked the same.  All of the Strangers wore ironic deputy badges on their vests, which were covered in dirt and dust and tarnish.  The people who had seen the Strangers gang and their badges did not know what the badges meant. Most of the Strangers were ex-lawmen, so that might have explained it.  But then Rifle knew that one had been a Confederate soldier at the very beginning of the War and another a bounty hunter from Mexico, and Leonard’s history was an utter mystery to both Stranger and man, so who knew what the badges meant, really?  Probably nothing.  And knowing Leonard, that was the whole idea.

The Strangers all wore pale gray hats and identical long gray coats that were only ever taken off when they were bathing, which was usually in a cold river, or a stream, or under the rain.  The Strangers did not like to be indoors, and they never went inside except for a short time, and never for the night.  South Dakota was where they belonged, Leonard told them.  And outside was South Dakota.  There was too much individuality inside.  People kept all the things they brought with them inside, he’d say.  But when they came out into the frigid western wind, they were all the same, and they knew where they really were.

So their coats were their covering, Leonard told them.  Gray, as the sky of South Dakota was gray.  When it rained, or snowed, the coats got wet, and stayed wet as long as the sky was wet.  When the coats dried, the sky was dry.  Their long gray coats moved as the sky of South Dakota moved.  When seen from a distance, the Strangers blended in neatly with the sky and the ground of South Dakota, having something of both of these things in the way they dressed and moved.  They were not invisible, of course.  The Strangers could be seen, if you looked carefully.  But they looked like ghosts in rags when compared to other riders on the plains.

Their horses were as sullen and quiet as the Strangers were, and pale, every one of them.  Spiritless animals, they were.  They could move quickly, but never seemed to hurry.  When they ran, their hooves moved lightly across the dirt, and did not make much noise or kick up much dust.  They were vapid when moving at any significant speed, formless pale blurs beneath the Strangers.  Just fog.

The infrequent descriptions of the Strangers gang in the papers or telegrams always seemed more suited to geography or weather than to men.  This was a good thing for the Strangers.  It kept potential pursuers—outlaws, the army, federal marshals or other lawmen—chasing rocks and clouds half the time instead of the gang.

Leonard led the Strangers with his one good eye, an eye that bled a little constantly from the hairline cut that ran from the bottom right corner to the upper left.  It was a cut that never healed.  Were it not for the blood, one could not see this cut unless they were very close to it, and the only man that had ever gotten that close to Leonard’s eye was the man who slashed it.

            Rifle looked up and saw the mountain in the distance.  To the right, about two miles from where the Strangers were, was the town of Shadow.  About three miles to the north was the ranch house where they had taken the fat man, Holland.  To the left of the Strangers, about a hundred yards away, were the large rocks.  Leonard told the Strangers to halt.  He told them to set up camp and to prepare dinner.  Rifle wasn’t hungry of course, but he was tired and ready to sleep and ready to dream about the woman.

            Leonard told them they would stay there for a little while.  Then they would move towards the mountain, and Van Carlo’s good boy.

            This journey, Rifle knew, all started with the meeting with Dakota Inc., several months ago.  That had been the first time the Strangers were at the large rocks outside of Shadow, because Leonard had learned that the outlaw Company was hiring gangs to work for them.

Leonard greatly hated outlaws.  Many times he would take their money, then trick them and kill them.  He used them as tools, but they were not his tools like the Strangers were his tools.  He hated them. They were simply fuel to be burned up as the Strangers moved around South Dakota.

The thing Leonard was most interested in was finding Van Carlo.  The Strangers would go from town to town, working occasionally with outlaw groups to make some money, tricking them, killing them, and looking for Van Carlo.  Leonard had sent Rifle and Fire to Shadow for a time, to negotiate a little deal with Dakota Inc., and to look around the town.

Dakota Inc. found Leonard in the way that it was whispered to them by a Stranger.  The Stranger was Fire, and he spent some time in Shadow milling around, very easily blending in and looking like someone people knew, and like someone who had lived there for years.  Fire was very good at this sort of thing.

He heard that Dakota Inc. was in need of gangs for hire, and he was the one who suggested Leonard and his Strangers gang.  Dakota Inc. felt that they knew this gang, and somehow had gotten it into their minds that they had heard some good things about them.  The Strangers worked clean, like the wind, and never left a trail.

But hired guns were a risky business, and Dakota Inc. understood this.  They were an expensive commodity that had no real loyalty.  Not even to money, and that was the problem. Hired guns could kill anyone they chose, regardless of the money.  And sometimes they did.  And if they were good, then they worked clean, and got away with it.  But Dakota Inc. also knew that hired guns were tools that, like any dangerous tool, had to be used every so often, whether you wanted to or not.  A saw might fall and cut your hand, but you still pulled it out of the shed when you needed it.

Fire told Dakota Inc. to send a man with a yellow mustache and yellow hair to a certain place outside of Shadow near some rocks.  When the man arrived, he was to waive a white handkerchief around his head.  Then the man was to remove his hat and put a black hood over his face with two holes cut out for the eyes.  Then he would put his hat back on, over the hood.

After this, three Strangers would approach him, and the man with the yellow mustache was to draw his gun and point it at the Strangers.  Then he would lead the Strangers at gunpoint to Shadow and to the place where they would meet with Dakota Inc.  The man with the yellow mustache was not to speak at all during the ride to Shadow or during the meeting, and was not to remove his hood until Leonard and his Strangers had left his sight.

***

“Why use the Strangers?” Leonard said. “We know you.  You’ve shot men in the streets of Shadow before, for everyone to see.”

Rocky Mote, the head of Dakota Inc. smiled and lit a cigar. He’d gotten over his initial shock of seeing the man, Leonard.  If he was a man, that is, Rocky thought.  There was something unnerving about the Stranger, and he found it difficult to be completely at ease around him.  He was there, standing in the middle of the relatively barren Dakota Inc. office, but there was an emptiness about him…a literal emptiness.  As if you could walk through him if you wanted to.  But not in a ghostly way.  It was not like he was some sort of apparition.  It was like he wasn’t there at all. Like you were talking to the wall, or to the air, and the wall and the air were talking back.  Rocky found himself dying to look behind the gray coat of the Stranger.  He honestly did not know what he’d find.  He half expected nothing at all.

“True,” Rocky said.  “And also true is that you know us.  This is the very reason why we hire men like you now.  The marshals and the Pinkertons have been sniffing closer lately.  So it appears that you aren’t the only ones who know us. Even the army is never far away these days.”

Leonard nodded sympathetically.

“Eastern hypocrites,” Rocky continued, “grumbling about cleaning up the west.  They send the Indians into dry gulches with nothing but diseased infected blankets.  Yankee factories with facades like shouting skulls grind their lifeless workers into meat cakes.  And yet they come out here to clean us up?  Six hundred thousand dead from the War heaped up with legs and arms twisted like circus freaks, and they’ve come to teach us ethics?”

Leonard nodded again. He approached the desk where Rocky was sitting and grunted.  On the desk was a ledger, with rows and columns of numbers and dollar signs scratched all up and down it.

“Eastern morality is simply the turning of pages,” Leonard said, leafing through the pages of the ledger, “one after the other, on and on.”  He kept turning pages until he found a blank one, then he stopped and put his finger in the middle of it. “It’s just business.  Same as everything.  Everything but the Strangers.”

Rocky reached up and snapped the ledger closed.  Leonard deftly and smoothly removed his hand before the book could catch his fingers.

With a growl, Rocky quickly put the ledger in one of the desk’s drawers.

“We do not want any connection to Holland Credence.  None at all,” he said, giving Leonard a stern look. Then he sighed and leaned back in his chair.  He looked slightly despondent. “The days of the men behind these desks going out and shooting a man dead in the streets are over.  Now, we stay behind the desks as much as we can.  It’s better for business.”

The Dakota Inc. boss lifted his left leg onto the knee of his right and removed his boot.  Grimacing, he rubbed his foot gingerly.  His feet always hurt these days.  He wore nice boots, but they were too tight.  But he liked it that way.  It reminded him of the dangers of being too comfortable.

“Your feet hurt,” Leonard noted.

“Yes.  I should put something else on, but these boots were expensive.”

“But you’d be more comfortable in something else,” Leonard said.

Rocky looked angry.  “I will decide my own comfort.  No one does it for me in South Dakota.”

Leonard’s eye began to bleed a little heavier; the bandannas went in and out of his mouth a little quicker.

“I see you prefer sitting to standing because standing makes your feet hurt,” Leonard said.  “It would seem that the ground of South Dakota has much to say about your comfort, Mr. Mote, originally of Oklahoma.”

Rocky looked at the Stranger with the one eye, and decided that he did not like him one bit.

“What are we talking about here?” he said, not hiding his annoyance. “Boots?  Posture preferences of an old man?  This reminds me of the days of fighting the Mexicans. I understood just enough of their babble for it to be maddening.  So let’s cut it.  I’m paying you, remember.  I was told by one of your Strangers to not ask you questions and to let you do what you do.  I expect the same from you, bandit.”

The depression in the bandanna that was Leonard’s mouth changed into the shape of a smile.  The eye bled even heavier.

“Bandit?  I’m the masked bandit?  Oh yes, now I understand,” he nodded, “but you.  You’ve been killing with your face uncovered and your head bald for years, and have never seen the gallows.” He pointed a finger at Rocky.  “Not because you could not be connected, but because you had power around here.  If you cannot do it yourself now, then what power do you have left?  What authority?  The President can come to South Dakota and kill the Indians in the broad daylight.  But what can you do?”

Rocky snickered.  “Money is power.  Murder is not.  Murder is something that money allows you to do.  It’s just another expensive commodity that most cannot afford.  Who cares how it’s done?  Who cares who the tool is?”  Rocky stood, and pointed a finger back at Leonard.  “But you need to understand something, Stranger.  The President is like you.  You’re a pauper, just like he is.”

“And we will take your money,” Leonard said, dropping his hand and stepping back.  “But this deal marks the end of your organization.  Hiring out this sort of thing is a gamble of long odds.  Just ask Van Carlo.”

At the mention of the gambler’s name, Rocky’s head snapped up.  He stared at leader of the Strangers with a clenched jaw.  Then he relaxed, and breathed out slowly.

“You never mind, him,” he said.  He lifted a satchel of money and dropped it on the desk with a leathery thud.  “Just do it.” Then he tipped his hat tersely, and walked quickly out of the room.

Leonard tipped his own hat and nodded at the man’s back.

“Now there is a man whose own mother would no longer recognize,” he said a few moments later.  “She would say, ‘What has happened to my darling boy from Oklahoma?  He seems so different.’”

The man with the yellow mustache was still in the office, wearing the black hood.  He stood near a window, uncertain as to what to do.

“Take off your hood,” Leonard said to him.

“But I was told…”

“How dare you,” Leonard said angrily.  “Show your face.” He pulled a long rifle from somewhere behind his coat and, with one arm only, aimed it at the man’s chest.

There was fear in the eyes inside the holes.  When the man removed the hood, the fear was still there.

“Where are you from?” Leonard asked.

“New York,” the man replied, trying to hide the fear in his voice.

Leonard lowered his rifle. “Don’t ever cover your face again.  You are no longer Leonard.  Now, it’s just me again.”

Then, all three Strangers left with the money.